Sunday, October 08, 2006

The Positive Effects of Additional Writing Instruction

A recent study published in Research in the Teaching of English (Hansen et al., 2006; available in print form in our library) concluded that students who took an AP English course and first-year writing performed significantly better on sophomore writing tasks than those students who took only AP English or only first-year writing. This study suggests that continued instruction and practice in writing solidifies student learning and better prepares students for future writing across the institution.

As the College Writing (English 110) Coordinator, I've been grappling for the past few weeks with what this study suggests about the efficacy of our AP policy for English 110. This year, over 70 Freshmen used AP credit to satisfy their College Writing requirement in the first-year core. Although these students demonstrated their ability to complete specific writing-on-the-spot tasks successfully, the AP test does not assess their ability to work with sources, to write for varied audiences or purposes, or to complete and integrate research that supports their argument. Therefore, students who “AP out of” College Writing might not have the same foundation for writing across the curriculum as their peers who take English 110 during the first year, and they definitely miss out on an additional semester of instruction and practice in writing.

For me, then, the RTE study serves as a challenge to fine-tune our placement practices for College Writing. The English 110 Committee and I have taken up that challenge and you can expect to here more from us in the coming months.

Yet, this study also offers a challenge to the larger university community. Hansen et al. are not the first researchers in Composition and Rhetoric to suggest that continued instruction and practice in writing has positive outcomes for writing across the curriculum. Imagine how well prepared students could be for subsequent writing tasks if they continued to encounter practice in writing and disciplinary specific strategies for writing in their classes across the curriculum and across all four years.

Students who successfully complete English 110 have a strong foundation for continued practice and instruction in writing. If you would like to help students build on this foundation in your courses, click here to learn more.

Friday, September 22, 2006

Political bias and student reactions

In the NYT article "The Academic Blues," English professor Michael Berube responds to the issue of liberal bias among college faculties, citing several examples of student discomfort and conservative out-cry. He concludes that "Every responsible teacher should think of the classroom as a relatively safe space, free of intimidation or coercion. But in return, ... students should expect to feel uncomfortable about [their] beliefs as a matter of course — that is, if your professors are doing their job properly, and keeping the floor open for every reasonable form of debate and disagreement."

Shifting to Elon: I had my Elon 101 students write anonymous "Dear Abby" letters describing a problem they've had this semester. One student expressed problems with a professor that has "raving liberal ideologies," commenting that "when assigned a paper, I need to write about what I think that he would think is true rather than my own opinions." My advice to the student echoed much of Berube's claims. Namely, that there will be professors who want to (or can't help but) express their political views in the classroom, but that students should not shy away from expressing their own opinions.

As a teacher of writing, it's disturbing to think that my students could sacrifice their political views to suit my leanings. The Dear Abby letter was not too surprising; I've had similar questions in conferences with my Eng110 students. They wonder how anyone could possibly put aside political views to objectively assess student writing. I hope that part of this is a cognitive development issue, and that, with time, my students will have a more complex understanding of the many lenses through which we view the world. But for now, I'm reminded that my first year students (and likely all of my students) need explanations about the teacher's evaluative lens. My hope is that by evaluating student work with descriptive rubrics that don't include "a liberal stance" as a criterion for success, my students will come closer to understanding how a well-supported and well-constructed argument can earn an "A" regardless of the professor’s political affiliation.

Sunday, September 17, 2006

Buying papers online, continued

The New York Times has an update to last Sunday's story about the poor quality of college term papers bought online.

The web service that guarantees its papers are "completely non-plagiarized"is not being completely truthful in its advertising. According to the Times, "every single paragraph" in the paper purchased from that site was plagiarized. The paper borrowed from a variety of online sources, making it simple to uncover the plagiarism.

Shocking.

Sunday, September 10, 2006

Buying papers online

The New York Times has an article today about web sites that sell "completely non-plagiarized" college papers. The piece, although not serious investigative journalism, should reassure those of us who assign papers.

A Times editor purchased three written-to-order literature papers from three different sites. The paper on Conrad's "Lord Jim" never got written. Technical difficulties. Sorry. The papers on a Shakespeare play ($49.75 for five pages) and on Huxley/Orwell ($127.96 for four pages) weren't much better.

Moral of the story for students? Follow the honor code - you'll learn and you won't waste money on failing grade.

Saturday, September 09, 2006

Faculty Tech Studio

Tony Crider and Megan Conklin, both CATL Scholars, have created the Faculty Tech Studio.

Here's how they describe the project: "Faculty Tech Studio is about emerging technologies for university faculty - discussing, learning, creating, using. We host monthly studios for faculty to share what they are doing, and to hear from others about new technologies being used in and out of the classroom."

Tony and Megan podcast each session, so you don't need to be present to learn from the conversations. The sessions are part Inside the Actors Studio and part The Gong Show -- perfect for listening while at the gym or mowing the lawn.

The first installment featured Kyle Altman (Physics) and Joel Karty (Chemistry) talking about personal response systems (aka clickers). Yesterday Tony and Megan led a discussion about different ways to use blogs in teaching - with Prudence Layne (English), Ashley Holmes (English), and Wayne Conley (IDD).

Monday, September 04, 2006

A "promising" syllabus?

Last week James Lang wrote about the "promising syllabus" (his article is available to Chronicle of Higher Ed subscribers -- if you're not one, email me for a copy). The idea is to help students develop a sense of control over their own learning in the course, rather than having students feel that their learning and work are dictated entirely by the professor. Since motivation and learning are intertwined, a "promising syllabus" will lead to more learning -- at least in theory.

Lang cites Ken Bain's book What the Best College Teachers Do as the inspiration for his thinking on the "promising syllabus." If you'd like to read Bain's book, sign up for the CATL reading group on it this fall.

If you'd like to see what happens when faculty push the "promising syllabus" far beyond what Lang or Bain suggest, check out Rich Mihans and Deborah Long's project on student redesign of an undergraduate course. Rich and Deborah involved seven students in the complete redesign of a course. They've just begun to analyze and write/present on their project, so stay tuned -- their early results are promising.

Friday, September 01, 2006

WTAL blog 2006-2007

Now that classes have begun, the WTAL blog is back in action!

The blog's purpose, you may recall, is to provide Elon faculty with resources and support on writing, teaching, and learning.

Six Elon faculty will contribute regularly to the blog this academic year:

  • Ashley Holmes, English
  • Jessie Kapper, English
  • Kathryn Wymer, IDD/CATL
  • Michael Strickland, English
  • Paula Rosinski, English
  • Peter Felten, CATL

Catherine Ross Dunham from Elon's new School of Law will be an occasional contributor to the blog.

We welcome your suggestions and comments about the blog and about writing, teaching, and learning at Elon.