March 17, 2000
The meeting was called to order at 2:35 p.m.
A request was made that the discussion concerning this year’s process
for pay raises be clarified. With this in consideration, the prior minutes
Report from Health/Benefits Subcommittee -- Robert Blake
Blake circulated a copy of the committee agenda and new drug benefits.
The key priorities for this subcommittee are listed below.
Report from Academic Standing Committee -- Teresa Lepors, Bill Rich, Rob Springer
An introduction memorandum and detailed multi-linear regression analysis study which compared student expected course grade with various other queries on the student course evaluation survey were circulated.
This committee addressed past questions raised concerning possible negative correlation between department GPA and department honors percentage. The committee concluded that there is no substantial correlation.
Totals were given for suspensions and probations. It is noted that these totals have of recent years been on the decline
Last year’s academic standing committee posed the possibility that there is a significant positive correlation between over-all student course evaluation scores and student expected grades. Rob Springer (director of institutional research) conducted an analysis of this possible correlation and concluded that it is, at best, quite weak. There does, however, seem to be a high correlation between the various questions in the course evaluation, such as question 14 (advancing educational goals), question 21 (provides beneficial feedback), and question 23 (stimulates interest).
Council expressed the following concerns to Springer:
Further discussion ensued concerning the lack of variation and the seeming
inflation of the student expected grade. A point was made that this inflation
may indicate that teachers may be removing any existing correlation between
grades and evaluations via unintentionally lowering their expectations
of the students. Or it could be the case that there just isn’t any real
correlation between expected grade and course evaluations.
Bylaw Change Concerning Athletic Standing Committee -- Vicki Hightower
Hightower pointed out that the current committee is extremely active at all possible levels. This, in part, is due to the natural coordination that occurs when the appointed NCAA Faculty Athletic Representative (FAR) is also the committee chairperson. (Proposed bylaw changes will make this committee consistent in that the chairperson will be elected from the elected members.) Investigation showed that though the larger schools follow a policy of separation of the FAR and the chairperson, most of the smaller schools don’t.
Council adamantly pointed out that the current proposed changes reflected in no way on the outstanding job the athletic committee and FAR have done. This is reiterated by both Dr. Lambert and Dr. Francis.
Council concluded that though experts, on the surface, may seem to be the best choices as committee leaders, they may be best viewed as sources of information and guidance. The current bylaw changes reflect the overall goal of both standardizing the structure of standing committees and determining leadership positions via faculty elections.
Hightower also emphasized that gender and divisional representation
are of utmost importance when considering nominees for the committee. Council
strongly concurred and affirmed its historical commitment to considering
these issues in all nominee selections.
Review of Bylaw Changes Submitted at the March Faculty Meeting
A copy of the current proposed bylaw changes was circulated.
The terms “Academic Vice President” and “Provost” should be used consistently throughout faculty handbook.
The phrase, “with votes,” should be omitted everywhere it is used.
No conflict exists between teacher licensure accreditation and proposed bylaw changes.
There is an ongoing dialogue with the SGA concerning changing the specifications of student representatives, as council finds the current ones unsatisfactory.
Significant changes were made as follows:
Report on Trustees Meeting -- Leo Lambert
President Lambert gave council an extremely positive briefing of the events surrounding the Board of Trustees meeting.
Elected members of Academic Council met to discuss elections and review agenda items for April and May meetings.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:00 P. M.
J. Todd Lee
Return to Academic Council 1999-2000 Minutes
Return to Academic Council Home Page